Soul... Knowing God, Day 3 -- The Study of God (part 2)

Packer does not leave us in the middle of a road without a map, as it were, when it comes to the study of God. For after he gives us good reason to study God and to consider it as worthwhile (and logical, for a sane person who has resources readily available to do so), he outlines the basic themes that he proposes we use as the outline for our study:
"We shall have to deal with the Godhead of God, the qualities of deity which set God apart from humans and mark the difference and distance between the Creator and His creatures...
"We shall have to deal with the powers of God: His almightiness, his omniscience, his omnipresence. We shall have to deal with the perfections of God, the aspects of his moral character which are manifested in His words and deeds...
"We shall have to take note of what pleases Him, what offends Him, what awakens His wrath, what affords Him satisfaction and joy." (Knowing God, copyright 1973 by J.I. Packer, Text Americanized and completely retypeset in 1993, Published in the USA by InterVarsity Press.)

But it's Packer's next statement that resonates within my mind as being so true and yet at the same time so sad:
"For many of us, these are comparatively unfamiliar themes. They were not always so to the people of God. There was a time when the subject of God's attributes (as it was called) was thought so important as to be included in the catechism which all children in the churches were taught and all adult members were expected to know. Thus, to the fourth question in the Westminster Shorter Catechism, 'What is God?' the answer read as follows: 'God is a Spirit, infinite, eternal, and unchangeable, in His being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth.'...
"Few children today, however, are brought up on the Westminster Shorter Catechism, and few modern worshipers will ever have heard a series of sermons covering the doctrine of the divine character in the way that Charnock's massive Discourses on the Existence and Attributes of God (1682) did. Few, too, will ever have read anything simple and straightforward on the subject of the nature of God, for scarcely any such writing exists at the present time..." (page 21).

Thanks to God's use of J.I. Packer (and, I might add, several others like him who likewise bless us in these present times, including R.C. Sproul and John Piper), there are now writings on the subject of the nature of God which are simple and straightforward (without being simplistic or inaccurate) -- may we not fail to take full advantage of their availability to us!